As evidenced by some of my blogs, there are literally hundreds of metadata standards and structured data formats available, all with their own acronym. This seems to have become more complicated with the emergence of numerous XML based standards in the early to mid noughties, and the more recent proliferation of RDF vocabularies for the Semantic Web and the associated Linked Data drive. What formats exists? How do they relate to each other? For which communities of practice are they optimised, e.g. information industry or cultural sector? What are the metadata, technical standards, vocabularies that I should be congnisant of in my area? And so the question list goes on...
These questions can be difficult to answer, and it is for this reason that Jenn Riley has produced a gigantic poster diagram (above) entitled, 'Seeing standards: a visualization of the metadata universe'. The diagram achieves what a good model should, i.e. simplifying complex phenomena and presenting a large volume of information in a condensed way. As the website blurb states:
"Each of the 105 standards listed here is evaluated on its strength of application to defined categories in each of four axes: community, domain, function, and purpose. The strength of a standard in a given category is determined by a mixture of its adoption in that category, its design intent, and its overall appropriateness for use in that category."A useful conceptual tool for academics, practitioners and students alike. A glossary of metadata standards in either poster or pamphlet form is also available.
No comments:
Post a Comment